ESPN's talking negative recruiting " Gamecocks getting the negative"
09/28/2015
"Recruiting is recruiting. People say and do things that sometimes they wish they probably didn't do when it's over with. That always happens." -- Jimbo Fisher, FSU coach.
Most schools have a manual that outlines everything the program hopes to accomplish on the recruiting trail. It's basically a recruiting playbook filled with details of how the school plans to operate. However, nowhere within any of these guides will you find recruiting's trick plays.
Negative recruiting is as much a part of today's college football recruiting as the pretty girls who act as hosts and the all-you-can-eat buffets prospects gorge on when they take campus visits. When asked about it with their names attached to the quotes, coaches say their school doesn't need to go negative to win a prospect over. Give these coaches a veil of anonymity and the secrets spill from their mouths.
"Negative recruiting happens everywhere in the country," a Pac-12 assistant who has worked in the ACC, Big Ten and Big 12 said. "Some would like to think it's just confined to the SEC or the Southeast, but that's just not true. It's everywhere. It's real."
There's no exact date when recruiting tends to turn negative, but it's usually about this time in the recruiting calendar. With just hours left before national signing day, coaches are eager to land the key player who's the missing piece for their program and often get desperate after spending two years chasing after him.
In many ways, it mirrors what happens during the final few weeks of a political campaign. Negative messages can potentially create fear, uncertainty and doubt in your opponent, and if it might end up giving them the final edge, recruiters will sling mud. And once that happens, the trick play has worked and will be rolled out again in the future, even if it leaves a bitter aftertaste in a coach's mouth.
"The pressure to win is higher than it's ever been before," said a veteran American Athletic Conference coach who has worked previously at Big 12 and SEC schools. "You have to win now if you want to still have a job. So, if that means you have to take the gloves off and go negative, then that's what you'll do.
"You don't like looking at yourself in the mirror in the mornings because you hate to have to go that direction, especially since recruiting is built off of trust and relationships. But deep down, coaches know to win you have to have talent, and to get that talent you have to sometimes bend the truth."
Does it work? The answer to that question is both yes and no. Obviously it does to some extent or coaches wouldn't turn to it as much as they do during recruiting's home stretch. Recruits themselves say they mostly tune it out and sometimes will actually be turned off to a school going negative. But in some cases one morsel of information can linger in the back of their minds and develop into a lasting impression of a school.
How do coaches do? Here's the guide to the art of being the bad guy.
The basics
When going negative, there are a few go-to subjects that lend themselves to picking apart a rival. These might not be the most popular tactics or fit every situation, but when the situation arises, they're easy to use.
Despite continued success, Bill Snyder's age is constantly in the crosshairs for negative recruiting. Peter G. Aiken/Getty Images
Coach in crisis
Nobody can truly predict the future, but that doesn't stop college recruiters from trying. At the first sign of trouble, however, a head coach's job security or longevity at a school becomes a focal point of a negative recruiting pitch.
Take Kansas State and South Carolina for example. Coaches at both schools have heard from rival recruiters for years that Bill Snyder and Steve Spurrier wouldn't be there by the time recruits graduated. Things turned so negative this season for the Gamecocks on the recruiting trail in December that Spurrier had to come out and publicly state he would be back for at least "two or three more" seasons. He then followed that up with a series of in-home visits with key recruits to help reassure them that he was indeed in it for the long haul.
The same happens with head coaches who are coming off bad seasons. Everybody has seen the websites that rank coaches on the hot seats or read about a coach's job being in jeopardy, and somehow that information magically ends up as part of conversations with recruits.
"If you allow a recruiter to smell blood in the water, he's going to go for the kill," a Conference USA assistant who has worked previously in the SEC and the Big 12 said. "Talking about a coach's future at that school is one of the easiest ways to go negative, because it's so hard for them to defend. The coach can tell you he and his assistants are going to be OK, but all you have to point out is their record and talk about what people in the press are saying. Unless his athletic director has come out and said his job is safe, then you can use that to your advantage all day long."
http://espn.go.com/c...tive-recruiting
09/28/2015
"Recruiting is recruiting. People say and do things that sometimes they wish they probably didn't do when it's over with. That always happens." -- Jimbo Fisher, FSU coach.
Most schools have a manual that outlines everything the program hopes to accomplish on the recruiting trail. It's basically a recruiting playbook filled with details of how the school plans to operate. However, nowhere within any of these guides will you find recruiting's trick plays.
Negative recruiting is as much a part of today's college football recruiting as the pretty girls who act as hosts and the all-you-can-eat buffets prospects gorge on when they take campus visits. When asked about it with their names attached to the quotes, coaches say their school doesn't need to go negative to win a prospect over. Give these coaches a veil of anonymity and the secrets spill from their mouths.
"Negative recruiting happens everywhere in the country," a Pac-12 assistant who has worked in the ACC, Big Ten and Big 12 said. "Some would like to think it's just confined to the SEC or the Southeast, but that's just not true. It's everywhere. It's real."
There's no exact date when recruiting tends to turn negative, but it's usually about this time in the recruiting calendar. With just hours left before national signing day, coaches are eager to land the key player who's the missing piece for their program and often get desperate after spending two years chasing after him.
In many ways, it mirrors what happens during the final few weeks of a political campaign. Negative messages can potentially create fear, uncertainty and doubt in your opponent, and if it might end up giving them the final edge, recruiters will sling mud. And once that happens, the trick play has worked and will be rolled out again in the future, even if it leaves a bitter aftertaste in a coach's mouth.
"The pressure to win is higher than it's ever been before," said a veteran American Athletic Conference coach who has worked previously at Big 12 and SEC schools. "You have to win now if you want to still have a job. So, if that means you have to take the gloves off and go negative, then that's what you'll do.
"You don't like looking at yourself in the mirror in the mornings because you hate to have to go that direction, especially since recruiting is built off of trust and relationships. But deep down, coaches know to win you have to have talent, and to get that talent you have to sometimes bend the truth."
Does it work? The answer to that question is both yes and no. Obviously it does to some extent or coaches wouldn't turn to it as much as they do during recruiting's home stretch. Recruits themselves say they mostly tune it out and sometimes will actually be turned off to a school going negative. But in some cases one morsel of information can linger in the back of their minds and develop into a lasting impression of a school.
How do coaches do? Here's the guide to the art of being the bad guy.
The basics
When going negative, there are a few go-to subjects that lend themselves to picking apart a rival. These might not be the most popular tactics or fit every situation, but when the situation arises, they're easy to use.
Despite continued success, Bill Snyder's age is constantly in the crosshairs for negative recruiting. Peter G. Aiken/Getty Images
Coach in crisis
Nobody can truly predict the future, but that doesn't stop college recruiters from trying. At the first sign of trouble, however, a head coach's job security or longevity at a school becomes a focal point of a negative recruiting pitch.
Take Kansas State and South Carolina for example. Coaches at both schools have heard from rival recruiters for years that Bill Snyder and Steve Spurrier wouldn't be there by the time recruits graduated. Things turned so negative this season for the Gamecocks on the recruiting trail in December that Spurrier had to come out and publicly state he would be back for at least "two or three more" seasons. He then followed that up with a series of in-home visits with key recruits to help reassure them that he was indeed in it for the long haul.
The same happens with head coaches who are coming off bad seasons. Everybody has seen the websites that rank coaches on the hot seats or read about a coach's job being in jeopardy, and somehow that information magically ends up as part of conversations with recruits.
"If you allow a recruiter to smell blood in the water, he's going to go for the kill," a Conference USA assistant who has worked previously in the SEC and the Big 12 said. "Talking about a coach's future at that school is one of the easiest ways to go negative, because it's so hard for them to defend. The coach can tell you he and his assistants are going to be OK, but all you have to point out is their record and talk about what people in the press are saying. Unless his athletic director has come out and said his job is safe, then you can use that to your advantage all day long."
http://espn.go.com/c...tive-recruiting
