This wouldn't be a bad way to go about it.
Just wanted to drop back in and thank everyone for your recommendations. I had a nice time and was treated well by your fans. You guys played much better than the score indicated and I think Hilinski will be a very good player for you moving forward.
Getting to the fairgrounds before the game was kind of crazy with traffic, but the post-game traffic flow was managed very well. I have been to some places (LSU, Auburn) where it's just a total cluster after the game. It was very efficient getting away from the stadium for me on Saturday.
Regarding a 9-game SEC schedule, Saban has been pushing for this for several years now. It doesn't sound like anyone else in the league is really behind it yet. I am not sure what it's like in Columbia, but there is an increasingly higher number of tickets available in Tuscaloosa for non-premium games (LSU, UT, Auburn, etc.) And fans are leaving early. It doesn't make for a great environment, especially against FCS teams.
Saban's ask was to have a 9-game league schedule, and of the other 3 games make at least 2 (if not all 3) be Power 5 opponents. And all 3 FBS. It would basically create two divisions within FBS - Power 5 and Group of 5. Would truly reward teams for scheduling up. And you wouldn't have to go undefeated to make the playoff. Would be closer to an NFL model.
Some have mentioned that it would kill FCS programs, but the P5 could do a revenue share with G5 and FCS teams to keep them afloat because the new scheduling system would create much better tv contracts. Imagine if South Carolina was playing 9 SEC games (6 East and 3 West) and then had UNC, Clemson, and someone like UCLA in the non-conference. Would make fans much happier and each weekend would be a lot more fun. And everyone would beat up on each other so the CFP committee would actually have to do their job and reward teams with the best resume rather than making it a beauty contest where they put in the same 4-5 teams every year.