This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Can't even have a real honest conversation on this board either without BS responses. I can go all the way back to Perry Orth (a walk on) to Bentley who did not give us the best opportunity to win and it showed but they were still in the game.
BS responses? How is your ability to judge the best players be judged as "not BS" but anybody who disagrees with you falls into that category? If you want to have a serious discussion then state your case why Orth or Bentley wasn't the best choice, and who was, and back it up with anything besides an opinion. Because so far, all is have is an opinion and a quote about how "we can't have serious discussions."
I don't agree with everything in this post, but there is some truth to it. In the Muschamp tenure, the best player did not always see the field, in my opinion. An example of that was Hilinski and Bentley. When Bentley went down, there was a marked difference in the offense with Hilinski, even with his lack of experience. Once he got injured, it negated most of that, but everyone was talking about that when it happened. A lot of the problems have been play calling and lack of making adjustments, and overall complacency by players and coaches, who were here to get a paycheck, or perform for scouts to get a paycheck later. I truly believe that those problems have been solved with the new coaching staff. Time will tell.
Wow someone has an inflated ego... So you state the coaches trying to keep 6 and 7 figure jobs did not play who they thought gave them the best chance to win...
?
