The timing of this "injury" seems kind of fishy to me. He looked perfectly fine on his feet before, during and after the game. To whoever said the Hilinski bashing will begin after one bad throw, well it may, but people gave Bentley the benefit of the doubt for the last 4 years. The situation is a bit different.
YES EXACTLY! And somebody please confirm for me exactly how Jake Bentley injured his foot. Nobody knows, and the staff and Jake have been silent about it.
CBS Sports speculated the following:
"From the television feed, Bentley didn’t appear to have any issues moving on South Carolina’s second-to-last drive. He tried to chase down a North Carolina defender who intercepted his final pass and appeared to slip, with receiver Xavier Legette and the defensive back falling on his legs.
On the game-ending sack, his legs were spread wide as we went down with a pair of defenders falling on him."
If I don't get a conclusive answer on this, I'm going to conclude two things:
1) The silence indicates that the story of a foot injury is likely not a truthful one;
2) This is simply a nicer way to supplant the Senior for the promising Freshman than what Clemson did with Bryant and Lawrence (although if that is the case, I much prefer the direct honest approach of Dabo to the manufactured story of a foot injury).
Regardless of who plays QB, if we do not improve the playcalling for the rest of the year, who plays at QB will not matter. Starting the Freshman will just calm a lot of fans down (e.g. "He's a Freshman, he's still learning...") while too many of us see the real issue, and have since last year.
With THREE SENIOR TAILBACKS, we should be running the ball AT LEAST twice as much as we throw it. Against UNC we had 24 called running plays and 37 called passing plays. And Senior Mon Denson didn't even play at all.
Therein lies the problem.
Any thoughts?