And an agreement that RU clearly broke when they invaded the Crimea in 2014.Um, there's also that little caveat that we guaranteed their security for them giving up their nukes under a treaty brokered by the Clinton administration.
And an agreement that RU clearly broke when they invaded the Crimea in 2014.Um, there's also that little caveat that we guaranteed their security for them giving up their nukes under a treaty brokered by the Clinton administration.
Correct. Which is/was another shining example of how worthless the UN is as an organization.And an agreement that RU clearly broke when they invaded the Crimea in 2014.
Correct. Which is/was another shining example of how worthless the UN is as an organization.
I'm trying to remember if the Nazi's had Nukes... the phrase fuck around and find out comes to mind, No one wants to find out!
Who from NATO has supported starting WWIII?
On Saturday, the head of NATO’s military committee said Ukraine has the solid legal and military right to strike deep inside Russia to gain combat advantage. Speaking in Prague at the close of the meeting of the alliance's military chiefs, Adm. Rob Bauer of the Netherlands said, “Every nation that is attacked has the right to defend itself. And that right doesn’t stop at the border of your own nation.”
Lt. Gen. Karel Řehka, chief of the General Staff of the Czech Armed Forces, made it clear his nation places no such weapons restrictions on Kyiv.
“We believe that the Ukrainians should decide themselves how to use it,” Řehka said.
Great further escalation.I saw one person with apparent Russian ties in the comments of one of the links saying the seismic reading only corresponded to about 3 tons of TNT, which he took that to mean that the drones took out one storage bunker instead of all 240 tons and that was it. Even if that's true, the shock waves would have destroyed most of the rest.
Allowing Ukraine to use long-range missiles to attack Russia's military supply chain could bring an end to the war faster. Russia's economy has been focused on the military for so long, just like Nazi Germany was before WW2.
NATO apparently supports Ukraine's use of long-range ballistic missiles against targets in Russia.
I think that support will be tested in a vote soon...
From the NYT, according to U.S. assessments, Russian casualties in the war so far number as many as 615,000 — 115,000 Russians killed and 500,000 wounded. Apparently if Russia has really lost 600,000 troops (who knows for sure, Putin sure won't admit it) they probably need the North Korean troops to help fill in. I heard the Indians they had fighting had been duped into going and were deserting them.So apparently there are North Korean troops in Russia...training? Are they needed in the Ukraine?
What’s in it for the N Koreans? They are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.From the NYT, according to U.S. assessments, Russian casualties in the war so far number as many as 615,000 — 115,000 Russians killed and 500,000 wounded. Apparently if Russia has really lost 600,000 troops (who knows for sure, Putin sure won't admit it) they probably need the North Korean troops to help fill in. I heard the Indians they had fighting had been duped into going and were deserting them.
I just know it is almost daily in the news talking about how many troops Russia is losing.
I wonder how many interpreters they have?
That's a very valid and fair question.What’s in it for the N Koreans? They are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.
Is Putin trading nuclear and / or rocket technology and parts / supplies for the troops?
It's a win win for NK. If he ends up losing thousands of troops that's X thousand fewer people to feed. Putin's probably paying NK in hard cash and or oil which he desperately needs both.What’s in it for the N Koreans? They are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.
Is Putin trading nuclear and / or rocket technology and parts / supplies for the troops?
The Russian soldiers talk disdainfully about the incoming North Korean soldiers, codenamed the “K Battalion,” at one point referring to them as “the f**king Chinese.”
In the same extract, a serviceman describes another who has been tasked to “meet people.”
“And he’s like standing there with his eyes out, like… f**k,” the soldier says. “He came here and says what the f**k to do with them.”
That's about how every soldier talked about another countries soldier in theater when they showed up, soldiers would talk about a replacement battalion like that... just saying!
NKs in Europe might prod NATO into admitting Ukraine as a member.
If things are so bad that Putin has to use a lifeline with NK, then he might as well admit defeat and pull out.
That wasn't my experience at all. I spent 24 years in the Army and the only troops we disparaged were Russian troops in Bosnia.That's about how every soldier talked about another countries soldier in theater when they showed up, soldiers would talk about a replacement battalion like that... just saying!