Gamecock Fanatics

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What should our response be if Russia invades Ukraine?

Those abandoned T-62s need to be captured, repaired and re-flagged as UAF assets.

We captured, re-flagged, and renamed countless British Royal Navy sailing vessels around the time of the War of 1812 to increase the size of our own Navy.

Back then a ship's captain received an actual monetary reward, or commission, on the tonnage they captured. That's the tradition where commissioned officers get their title from today, but back then there was a lot of money to be made.

We simply didn't have the time or resources to build our own ships for the war.
 
Those abandoned T-62s need to be captured, repaired and re-flagged as UAF assets.
I think the UAF/ZSU already has enough captured equipment. We're now see lots of vids of drones dropping grenades into abandoned vehicles in order to destroy them.

M2 Bradley on left, Slovenia T-55S on the right. The T-55 is a significantly upgraded version. UA/ZSU is working hard to get ready for a summer counter offensive.
FugpquKXoAY5O1b.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's really beautiful country over there. You hate to see it screwed up by a horrible ground war such as this one.

I still believe Putin's invasion will fail because the Ukrainians are defending their own country, while the core Russian military past Putin's contractor goons are really not into it that much.
 
Same thing here.


“These are someone’s fathers and someone’s sons,” Prigozhin says. “The scum that doesn’t give us ammunition will eat their guts in hell.”

Yohann Michel, a research analyst with the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank, said Prigozhin’s comments should usually be taken with a grain of salt, but “this time I would take a shovel of salt, at least, or maybe a truck.”
 
If the Wagner Group pulls out, then the Russian Army regulars probably won't have the stomach for the offensive much longer, either.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC7ZpzmbXds

The Russian Army vets at the end of this video were just normal guys glad for the fighting to be over when the end of the war came.

The sacrifices of the U. S. Army's 84th Infantry Division in Northwestern Europe during WW2 were substantial BTW. We need to stand firm so it's not repeated.

Time is on the side of the UAF the longer they can hold out.
 
Time is on the side of the UAF the longer they can hold out.
UAF/ZSU offensive is emminent once the mud dries up. Consensus is they are going to try and cut off the Russian land bridge, which will help isolate Crimea.

The next 6 months are going to be dramatic. Slava Ukrani!
 
UAF/ZSU offensive is emminent once the mud dries up. Consensus is they are going to try and cut off the Russian land bridge, which will help isolate Crimea.

The next 6 months are going to be dramatic. Slava Ukrani!
Make no mistake about it, if the Wagner Group pulls out this is a big deal. Russia is already scraping to get manpower to cover the areas it's in control of and or trying to retain control of.

Having to cover the areas the Wagner Group vacates is going to be a problem for Russia. This would obviously also cause the actual Russian casualty count to climb even more.
 
Having to cover the areas the Wagner Group vacates is going to be a problem for Russia. This would obviously also cause the actual Russian casualty count to climb even more.
Russia will get their azzes kicked if the UAF/ZSU can master combined arms & logistics to support an armored assault. But we just don't know effective those Russian trenches/minefields will be. If the UAF/ZSU gets stalled, they may be open for lots of arty & take losses.

So many unknowns! :oops:
 
Top