Good point. lolbecoming unhinged?
Good point. lolbecoming unhinged?
I would imagine that some Swiss bank accounts are profiting nicely from this.We seem to want to keep this thing going wonder why?
The Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces said last week that the Russian missile frigate Admiral Gorshkov, the nuclear submarine Kazan, the oil tanker Pashin and the salvage tug Nikolai Chiker will arrive on June 12 and stay for a week.
Users of the website marinetraffic.com have been tracking the position of the U.S. and Russian ships in recent days. According to the website, the Russian sea rescue tug Nikolay Chiker was positioned 26 nautical miles from Key Largo on Tuesday morning.
Why is it Ok for Russia to rain down rockets on Ukraine but Ukraine can't rain down rockets on Russia?Let’s hope that is all it is. I don’t think sending rockets into Russia was a smart move. We were sold the line that it would only be to defend themselves. Wag the dog
Why are we giving them rockets to rain down on Russia in a losing battle? We were to provide arms for defense now we are providing rockets for offensive strikes and now we seem to want to provoke Russia with more talks of NATO for Ukraine. It seems that we want this conflict not that we are trying to defend Ukraine. Makes no sense whatsoever. I've learned in life when thinks don't make sense follow the money.Why is it Ok for Russia to rain down rockets on Ukraine but Ukraine can't rain down rockets on Russia?
The best defense is a good offense. And I disagree that this is a losing battle, Ukraine doesn't have to defeat Russia in the conventional sense. They just have to make Russia withdraw from their country.Why are we giving them rockets to rain down on Russia in a losing battle? We were to provide arms for defense now we are providing rockets for offensive strikes and now we seem to want to provoke Russia with more talks of NATO for Ukraine. It seems that we want this conflict not that we are trying to defend Ukraine. Makes no sense whatsoever. I've learned in life when thinks don't make sense follow the money.
I hope you are right, but I do not see Russia withdrawing. At this point is would be seen as weak. US providing rockets to attack Russia proper is only going to allow Putin to sell the idea that having NATO on their border is bad for Russia. I do not like that we are becoming more involved bit by bit and hope we don't put boots on the ground, but so far we have done well beyond what we originally stated and things seem to be escalating.The best defense is a good offense. And I disagree that this is a losing battle, Ukraine doesn't have to defeat Russia in the conventional sense. They just have to make Russia withdraw from their country.
Ukraine should be hitting any legitimate targets they can hit. Military bases, naval shipyards, oil facilities, rail facilities etc.
The Russians withdrew from Afghanistan when the cost became too high. The main reason for this was the US supplying shoulder fired Stinger missiles.I hope you are right, but I do not see Russia withdrawing. At this point is would be seen as weak. US providing rockets to attack Russia proper is only going to allow Putin to sell the idea that having NATO on their border is bad for Russia. I do not like that we are becoming more involved bit by bit and hope we don't put boots on the ground, but so far we have done well beyond what we originally stated and things seem to be escalating.
But I was told if we keep sending money the war would be over soon and Ukraine would win...So we sent Billions if dollars to hype up Ukraine beating Russia for Biden to tell you we could have nuclear Armageddon... I hate saying I told you so but diplomacy is the only answer unless you want to see Ukraine obliterated and a nuclear war!
So if Russia publicly trained and provided, you pick the country, to rain missiles down on the US would you think that an act of war by Russia?The Russians withdrew from Afghanistan when the cost became too high. The main reason for this was the US supplying shoulder fired Stinger missiles.
The Afghans were knocking down Russian helicopters like crazy with Stingers. Let me ask you this, if Ukraine capitulates do you believe that Putin will stop there?
The Russians invaded both countries. When the cost became too high for the rewards they left Afghanistan. When the cost for trying to subdue Ukraine becomes too high they will leave Ukraine.So if Russia publicly trained and provided, you pick the country, to rain missiles down on the US would you think that an act of war by Russia?
Do you really think Afghanistan and Ukraine compare...
It's easy, just get them to leave the country and give up all that US tax payer funding...
So if Russia publicly trained and provided, you pick the country, to rain missiles down on the US would you think that an act of war by Russia?
Exactly. Great example.It's not quite that simple.
"Russia training and supplying arms to Mexico to bomb the us" is very different from the "US invades Mexico for no reason, and then Russia provides arms and training to hep Mexico defend itself."
“I don't think people really understand just kind of how deadly serious it is what we're doing and how under threat the ships continue to be,” Cmdr. Eric Blomberg with the USS Laboon told the AP on a visit to his warship on the Red Sea.
“We only have to get it wrong once," he said. "The Houthis just have to get one through.”
Seconds to act
The pace of the fire can be seen on the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, where the paint around the hatches of its missile pods has been burned away from repeated launches. Its sailors sometimes have seconds to confirm a launch by the Houthis, confer with other ships and open fire on an incoming missile barrage that can move near or beyond the speed of sound.
“It is every single day, every single watch, and some of our ships have been out here for seven-plus months doing that," said Capt. David Wroe, the commodore overseeing the guided missile destroyers.